Lafayette College’s Board of Trustees unanimously declared full confidence in college President Nicole Hurd on Friday, two days after the faculty passed a no-confidence motion against her.
“Our faith in President Hurd and her dedication, energy, and abilities to lead Lafayette College is unwavering,” reads a statement from the board. “She is, in our estimation, best positioned to lead this College in this most extraordinary time.”
The board’s statement and resolution of support, which was sent in a community-wide email, was signed by Board of Trustees Chairman Bob Sell ‘84, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“I am humbled by the statement of support by our Board of Trustees,” Hurd wrote in a second community-wide email.
Hurd did not respond to a request for comment.
The board’s resolution follows Tuesday’s faculty no-confidence vote, which passed 102-86 with six abstentions. The motion, proposed by 10 faculty signatories, claimed that Hurd has “harmed the institution of Lafayette College” by sidelining its academic mission and excluding faculty from decision-making.
The motion called on the 35-member Board of Trustees, the college’s ruling body, to “address this leadership crisis.”
In the board’s statement, Sell acknowledged that the faculty “have spoken this week through the College’s system of shared governance.”
“We commit ourselves to work with President Hurd to resolve the impasse and maintain transparency,” he wrote.
Hurd echoed this sentiment.
“Despite our disagreements, we share the common bond of caring for Lafayette,” Hurd wrote of the faculty in her email to the Lafayette community. “I am encouraged that we are formally initiating constructive conversations between faculty, administration, and Trustees.”
Hurd did not elaborate on the nature of the “constructive conversations.”
Anthropology and sociology department head Caroline Lee, one of the motion’s original signatories, wrote in an email that the faculty had exercised its “solemn responsibility to protect the best interests of the college and its students.”
“The board bears responsibility for choosing the president,” Lee continued. “We will continue to perform our duties with excellence and uphold the mission of the college.”
The board’s resolution of confidence in Hurd cites Lafayette’s healthy finances, record applications for the incoming class of 2029 and the college’s relationship with the city of Easton as evidence of her effective leadership.
The resolution also praises the completion of the campus-wide strategic plan, a plan that the Board of Trustees unanimously approved days after it was narrowly rejected by the faculty.
The Hurd administration’s alleged “disenfranchisement” of the faculty during the strategic planning process was cited as the impetus for the no-confidence motion by another of its original signatories, anthropology professor William Bissell.
The Board of Trustees’ resolution praises the hiring of 15 permanent faculty positions, six new-tenure positions and nine new lecturer roles.
“Nicole Farmer Hurd and her Administration have made significant progress in strengthening and improving Faculty consultation,” the resolution reads.
“Now that the faculty have spoken, I trust the Board will listen,” wrote International Affairs Department Chair Angelika von Wahl in an email before the board’s statement was issued. Von Wahl was one of 10 signatories of the no-confidence motion.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Lechau wekink • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:39 pm
It’s difficult not to imagine how much stronger and more cohesive the educational program of the college would be if those few faculty leaders who directed the recent no confidence vote in President Hurd would simply pack up their expertise and dedication to set off in search of other institutions they feel better suits their intellectual and academic aims. Of course this an unideal outcome, to be sure, but what else to suggest given recent news of this intemperate vote?
At this juncture in higher education, with so much at stake for liberal arts institutions (charging upwards of $87,000 per year for tuition) those faculty who feel the college doesn’t reflect their high standards should simply walk away. Take their fight somewhere else.
The Board would be wise to remember there are plenty of talented, un- and under employed Ph.Ds who have graduated since the economic downtown of 2008 who would gladly and confidently take the place of these rancorous professors who clearly don’t enjoy their position on the faculty of the college under the 21st century style leadership of the current President.
Friends of Lafayette • Jan 31, 2025 at 4:30 pm
A step forward for the Lafayette community. Kudos to the Board and to President Hurd for their vision and commitment to moving the needle. And to those disgruntled faculty, I’d suggest putting your egos on the shelf or stepping aside. I’m sure there are plenty of other fine organizations that will appreciate your cliched messaging and personal activism. We are Lafayette!
Ted Ruthizer ‘69 • Jan 31, 2025 at 4:52 pm
So ignorant. Sort of like telling Vietnam War protestors in my day to leave the U.S. if we didn’t like its policies. The faculty who voted in favor of the no confidence resolution represent the highest ideals of the college by wanting to ensure it has the right leadership.
Paul Young, Pard son, brother and dad • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:28 pm
As the treasurer of an important educational charity, I am often exposed to the interior politics of the academy.
Administrations and boards are generally quite loyal to the mission and reputation of their schools. However faculty members, and particularly non-STEM faculty members, can be more parochial – putting their research and personal politics ahead of the interests of the students, let alone the college as a whole. It would be interesting to see how the faculty voted by department.
In any event, picking between the judgements of the board and those of the faculty, I would go with the board every time.
Allen Haddad • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:15 pm
As Dr. Hurd reminds us, Lafayette is about the power of “AND”.
We can be great scholars and successful athletes.
We can have strong STEM programs and dynamic humanities.
We can embrace the Arts and the Sciences.
We are a great college on The Hill and part of our founding city, Easton.
We have an outstanding faculty and staff and administration and board.
The power of “AND”!
We are Lafayette!
Jan and Allen Haddad ’78
President Hurd must go • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:11 pm
A desperate move by a Board that made a mistake in handpicking Hurd after two more professional Presidents and leaders of the institution to save face.
What’s true is there’s no coming back from the comprehensive case the faculty have laid out against President Hurd in their motion.
Good Point • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:38 pm
Good point. What’s true here is she remains the President of Lafayette. I will leave you with this…
Takin’ on a challenge is a lot like ridin’ a horse. If you’re comfortable while you’re doing it, you’re probably doing it wrong
Young Alum • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:01 pm
Of course they did. They want a weak, incompetent figurehead whose only job is to keep a few students and alumni happy, not a leader to run an academic institution. This will definitely help the college retain the best talent and reverse its falling standards.
But hey, at least the rich Alums will get more sports facilities they wanted and overgrown lax bros will have something to celebrate. Then they complain about why so many Alums who weren’t involved in Sports or Greek Life are disengaged from the institution post graduation.
Good Point • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:29 pm
Good point. Please share what your opinion is based on? Falling standards? Many alums, from all walks of life, support this college. Maybe take a look in the mirror, or better yet, reach out to someone if you’re feeling disengaged yourself.
Be curious, not judgmental.
Proud Pard • Jan 31, 2025 at 4:37 pm
“Overgrown Lax bros”? Apparently the “dumb jock” stereotype is still permissable to perpetuate. Be better “Young Alum”.
Wiliam Rappolt'67 • Jan 31, 2025 at 2:51 pm
Outstanding resolution ….well thought out and reasoned
Proud Pard • Jan 31, 2025 at 2:25 pm
Yes! Cooler (more reasonable) heads have prevailed. Keep cookin’ President Hurd!!
Not a proud pard today • Jan 31, 2025 at 3:03 pm
She’s cooking up a whole mess, that’s for sure.
Proud Pard • Jan 31, 2025 at 4:53 pm
No doubt the next few months might be rocky as I expect the aggrieved faculty will go into full “petulant child mode”. In the long term, however, I’m confident today was a great day for Lafayette College.