Lafayette College President Nicole Hurd lost a faculty no-confidence vote on Tuesday, becoming the first president in the college’s nearly 200-year history to do so.
The no-confidence motion passed 102-86 with six abstentions, according to the Clerk of the Faculty Joshua Smith.
“The whole meeting was really taken up with this motion,” Government & Law Professor John Kincaid said. “There were plenty of speakers on both sides of the motion, so it was a very vigorous debate.”
While symbolic, the vote spells uncertainty for the future of Hurd’s presidency. The faculty called upon the Board of Trustees to address what it called a “leadership crisis.”
“It doesn’t feel like a win when it’s something so serious for the College,” wrote Caroline Lee, the anthropology and sociology department head and one of the motion’s 10 original authors, in an email. “It’s not our job to decide the next step, but I hope that we have a quick resolution and can get back to moving forward at this incredible institution.”
Hurd declined to comment.
“Lafayette College is fortunate to have faculty and staff who care deeply about the institution and its future success,” college spokesman Scott Morse wrote in a statement.
“During her tenure at Lafayette, President Hurd has always valued constructive dialogue with faculty and staff in all departments,” Morse wrote. “She acknowledges the vote and pledges to continue working closely with the faculty to advance the academic mission of the College.”
About 51% of no-confidence votes end with the president leaving office within a year, an analysis from the Chronicle of Higher Education found. Lafayette’s Board of Trustees is the only body with the ability to remove Hurd from office.
However, removal is not the only possible outcome and the board is not obligated to pursue any action. It is unclear how or when they will proceed.
Board of Trustees Chairman Bob Sell wrote in an email that the trustees will convene “to discuss the faculty meeting and its outcome” sometime this week, adding that a statement would come after this meeting.
Student reactions to the faculty’s decision are mixed.
“She seems like she cares, but if she cares about the wrong things, that might be a little bit problematic for the rest of us non-athletes,” Mika Harari ’28 said. “She was always sweet, she was never mean, at least from my experience.”
“Going over all the professor’s heads to make a unilateral decision seems pretty scummy,” said Matthew O’Leary ’26, who clarified he “skimmed” the motion.
“I didn’t really know any of this until my professors were talking about it,” Natalie Myers ’28 said. “I liked her.”
The faculty meeting in which the vote occurred lasted over two hours inside Marquis Hall. The meeting was preceded by a student demonstration, in which over 150 students — primarily student-athletes — gathered to show support for Hurd. The event was advertised in multiple sports and class GroupMe chats.
The motion states that Hurd has “harmed the institution of Lafayette College” by deprioritizing its academic mission and excluding the faculty from decision-making.
“The past three and half years of the Hurd administration have generated a working environment that no longer allows us to fully thrive in our jobs as teacher-scholars and as staff members,” the motion reads.
Andreas Pelekis ’26 contributed reporting.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
LC’s Canary • Jan 29, 2025 at 11:40 pm
Wow, I feel sad for the students who are witnessing, for the faculty who are second-guessed, and for the athletes who must carry the burden.
Roll Pards • Jan 29, 2025 at 10:49 pm
The president is officially more of a liability than an asset to the College. Time to cut bait.
We should be grateful for recent events to nip this in the bud so she doesn’t further publicly embarrass us on an even bigger stage in the future (similar to Penn, Harvard, Cornell presidents).
The longer she stays, the longer this situation will metastasize, deepen, and worsen. Seems the relationships she damaged are beyond repairing. The sooner this no-confidence vote is addressed and resolved, the better.
Similar to country over party, it’s truly Lafayette > Hurd.
Our community deserves to be led and united by a president who listens (and is not defensive nor deflects) and treats people equally (does not give preferential treatment).
Even in her inauguration address she disparaged the previous administration–red flag from day 1. Live and learn. Anyhow…
It’s sad for everyone, but we can and will rebuild and thrive.
Former Employee • Jan 29, 2025 at 6:02 pm
As a former employee (who was one of many who felt like Hurd’s plans – or lack thereof – drove them away), I believe that two things can be true: Hurd likely did have good intentions to improve the standings of athletic programs, driving purpose for students and alumni to fill once-empty seats at oft-ignored sporting events. Few things at colleges drive long-lasting passion (and the likelihood of becoming a donor) as athletics.
With that being said, Hurd’s ambitions to move athletics to the forefront at Lafayette often meant other priorities, including the academic principles the institution was founded on, to fall by the wayside. In shared meetings, many who gave their heart and soul to the institution were put off by her lack of clarity, true failure to focus on priorities important to faculty and staff, and overall demeanor. Many who have since left Lafayette for greener pastures (and told HR in their exit interviews who drove them out the door) experienced a different, dismissive side of Hurd toward faculty and staff, even though those same people would admit to seeing her heavily interact with students. Furthermore, her long streak of keeping people close to her in high-salary roles (when at least one of those people didn’t even reside in the state of PA) had many raising eyebrows.
So yes, it can be true that Hurd had a rightful focus on building athletics, AND has been a poor leader overall – particularly when Lafayette had superior candidates for the presidency back when she was hired. There were many warnings about her even before her inauguration. It’s a shame the board didn’t heed them.
Alum Pard • Jan 29, 2025 at 5:14 pm
(3 of 3 comment): A leader with self-respect would resign after this no-confidence vote, but narcissists play the victim and lack self-awareness and responsibilities for their behavior. (If you can’t see through her inauthenticity while she purports to act ever-so-authentic — oh, the irony — then you need to ask yourself why you fall so easily for a phony veneer without pursuing facts and underlying substance. You bein’ conned, girl.)
She needs to be removed and replaced with a leader who can unify — not further divide — its community.
We need a seasoned experienced higher education leader who respects and honors institutional knowledge and protocol and procedures adhering to shared governance including all faculty and all students — not just athletic programs and athletes.
Without them — the core of our precious higher education institution (reminder: not a sporting franchise) — there is no Lafayette College.
Alum Pard • Jan 29, 2025 at 5:07 pm
My 2nd of 3 comments:
Let’s explore substantial facts: an unsuccessful leadership of the strategic planning process, deceiving the entire Lafayette community saying it was an inclusive process, and a mass faculty and staff exodus.
There are many other facts, including lack of transparency, accountability, responsibility, and communication (read section 2 of the Motion of No Confidence regarding the College destroying 46 trees without proper approvals, resulting in a public embarrassment for our “sustainable campus”—a settlement was reached).
Every vice-president has departed during her presidency, collectively bringing hundreds of years of talent, institutional knowledge and LC acumen and enthusiasm with them.
Replacements have not been prioritized including the Chief Information Officer/VP for Information Technology Services who left in September—a job posting isn’t even live and an interim tech executive still has not been announced. In the age of AI and an urgent need for an executive tech leader, this is problematic.
Even her pursuing hosting the VP debate on campus strayed from her core role. If it wasn’t canceled, the costly debate would’ve disrupted faculty and students’ daily endeavors for at least six weeks, a debate they wouldn’t have been able to attend that likely would’ve cost millions to host. Dollars that could instead be spent to upgrade smart classrooms and dorms, fund research, provide grants, and most importantly, boost professors’ salaries.
Alum Pard • Jan 29, 2025 at 5:00 pm
1st of my 3 comments: This unprecedented historic no-confidence vote speaks volumes about President Hurd’s ineffective, disruptive leadership style, and inability to perform essential job functions while deprioritizing academics.
The toxic, divisive environment she created brought us to this crisis. As a loyal alum, it’s clear the faculty have repeatedly tried to voice important issues and were silenced, so it came to escalating this breaking point (i.e., March 2023 Points of Concern letter included in the motion of No Confidence document).)
To trustees: kindly remove your blinders. Stop protecting her. She must leave.
If this was an HR department, based on facts and the no-confidence vote, they would fire her. Trustees can and should do that.
To fellow alums and parents who fall for her rhetoric of “love:” set emotions aside. Words can be phony despite how wonderful they seem and feel on the surface.
I implore you to objectively read the motion signed by many faculty members — including more than half a dozen department heads.
‘24 Alum • Jan 29, 2025 at 2:44 pm
I am an alum in support of the faculty’s advocacy for themselves and Lafayette as an institution. I would only add in response to as many have stated that the issue with Hurd’s leadership when it comes to connecting with students her prioritizing of certain demographics or organizations of students. A lot of these alum and current students who claim support and attention from President Hurd, and shock that others don’t feel similarly and find offense as such, I beg you to consider that your organization or group may be the selective priority of this president. The deep entitlement in some of these comments is astonishing, but unsurprising and very telling what corner Lafayette is turning. I do not trust that Lafayette will be able to point out these fractures in the community and react accordingly, but I hope this will continue to encourage lesser recognized and supported student organizations and initiatives to continue to use their voice and maintain close ties with faculty that do the work.
Friends of Lafayette • Jan 29, 2025 at 2:15 pm
Time to right the ship.
Nicole Hurd has done a tremendous job in her short tenure of connecting with not only faculty, but alumni, families, and students. Her vision is commendable, one in which Lafayette is and will continue to be an academics-first institution, AND one in which successful athletic programs bring visibility and support to campus. Not at the expense of academics, but in concert with one another. Denying the value of this relationship in today’s world is outdated and impractical.
It’s striking that a small subset of activist faculty holds more sway than they should here. Take a close look at the faculty and their records who’ve signed onto this letter. These are individuals with a penchant for social activism, not hands-on, real world experience. Their complaint of ‘prioritizing athletics over academics’ is an old, tired, and cliched one. I have full confidence that the board will see through these outdated, oft-recited ideologies and recognize the immense value, vision, and relationships that President Hurd has built in her short time on College Hill.
There are a tremendous number of extremely talented and well-versed faculty at Lafayette who are expected to, and many who do very well, prepare students for a productive life in society. The irony is that this small subset of sheltered, activist faculty have no experience doing so themselves. These are unfortunately professors more interested in preserving their own jobs and continuing to preach their insular ideologies, void of practical application outside the walls of their offices, than recognizing the responsibility they have at a respected institution like Lafayette.
Higher Ed Ed • Jan 29, 2025 at 4:33 pm
It’s not a “small subset of activist faculty.” She lost the motion 100 to 80 with 6 abstentions. I believe she cares about the college and students, but that doesn’t mean her presidency has been successful. She has not responded well to criticism and I think the vote was appropriate.
Lou • Jan 29, 2025 at 1:26 pm
I have been following this developing story for quite some time, and offer another perspective. While not a college, I am 12-year trustee of a small New England junior boarding and day school who faced almost identical circumstances a few years ago.
I am watching and hearing all sides here. O. The whole, I have been a supporter of Nicole Hurd, and I like her on a personal level. That said, good Board, and I have no reason to believe Lafayette does not have this, must weigh the perspectives of numerous constituencies, and of the overall good of the institution itself. Faculty are a critical constituency, nothing good happens without solid faculty. But families are also a hugely important constituency.
What I can say, is that being a trustee can be like walking a tightrope, and one cannot act too slowly nor too hastily. Hiring and firing of heads/presidents is the most important function of a trustee. Having read all the comments, I don’t know what the right answer here is, but I can say that no one who has yet commented is categorically wrong. This is the challenge of being a trustee.
In any event, Lafayette is a solid institution approaching is 200th year; we’ll get through this.
Melissa Cunniffe • Jan 28, 2025 at 10:03 pm
What a shame. In our four-year experience at Lafayette, my son and our family experienced the growth of their sport, headed by a dedicated athletic director, backed by the college president, and financially supported by a reinvigorated group of alums. It was President Hurd who supported the hiring of an athletic director that supported the coaches and team. During that time, when the athletes were up at 5:30AM to hit the field by 5:45, practice then get to class, more field time, and more studying they were taught how to build their resumes to become productive people in the workforce. From career development to volunteer work off campus, this team of young men balanced high academic achievement with intense athletic development…both involved high levels of rigor and the expectation of excellence. President Hurd is a supporter of the athletic programs BECAUSE of the academic excellence by which Lafayette is known. What an absolute shame that even with the new Simon Center for Economics and Business, and the new Rockwell Integrated Sciences Center it is not enough to appease the professors. For our family, Lafayette was a treasure. Our son received a top notch education (we thought–until these professors made us feel differently) all while participating in a Division I sport and developing as a thoughtful human being. Thank you, President Hurd!
Recent Alumnus • Jan 28, 2025 at 9:29 pm
Great news. As an alumnus, I found President Hurd to be desperate for attention from a handful of alumni with a sports background and completely unresponsive and unwilling to engage with issues raised by several younger alumni recently concerned with her leadership style.
She also fails to understand that Lafayette isn’t a sports first institute, it is first and foremost an academic institution and crucial to delivering that function are the faculty. It is clear she has lost the trust of faculty and can’t perform one of the essential functions of her job, acting as a bridge between the faculty and the board.
Additionally, her use of Student Government as a rubber stamp, by hosting a dinner and cornering representatives of the student body to vote in front of her, represents her extremely undemocratic style of governance that should have no place in an institution like Lafayette with shared governance as a cornerstone. She would not have needed to do this if she had buy in from students, which I hear is a constituency she has spent a lot of time courting and trying to make happy. This was further demonstrated when today she had to orchestrate a protest organized by student athletes and I’m assuming ordered by their coaches, the kind of stuff you see from insecure autocrats in North Korea or Iran, not Easton, Pennsylvania.
The Board must heed the call of faculty and numerous alumni who have seen the stewardship of the college go from bad to worse. If she has any self respect, the President should have resigned by now.
Nick • Jan 29, 2025 at 7:30 am
You can have academic excellence and be a great sports school, Ever hear of the Ivy League? The rest of the Patriot League is combining both!!! Lehigh, Holy Cross and the rest do both extremely well. Lafayette had a great history in sports and I fear this absurd move by the faculty is totally misdirected. My, son is a Lafayette grad and played football there. He was extremely well educated and has had great success in life and he owes it all to Lafayette.
Recent Alumnus • Jan 29, 2025 at 8:07 am
You absolutely can be both, and Lafayette should have that ambition, but not if it means Sports comes at the expense of academic excellence. When it seems like the school has money to hire new sports staff and construct new facilities but can’t care to make sure Faculty comp keeps up with peer institutions, the priorities are clearly off.
Higher Ed Ed • Jan 29, 2025 at 4:37 pm
I agree 100%. And when employees have tried to address this with her in a thoughtful manner she has been defensive rather than reflective. She appears to be a caring person at her core, but that doesn’t mean she’s a good leader or an effective President,
Concerned alum. • Jan 28, 2025 at 9:23 pm
An absolute embarrassment to the College. I for one will not donate to the College. As for the Trustees, a strong message needs to be sent to these faculty members. The Trustees and donors run the College, not a bunch of academics who could not earn a living in the real world if their lives depended upon it.
My fellow alums, I call on you to stand with the President. Please do not let the inmates run the asylum.
Another concerned Alum • Jan 28, 2025 at 9:33 pm
The college runs because of the faculty, who are some of the best in the game, and it would cease to exist without world class academics educating the next generation of Pards. I’m an alum and I proudly stand with the faculty and will continue contributing as long as faculty and academics are kept front and center at what is, need I remind you, an academic institute.
current student • Jan 28, 2025 at 9:43 pm
hey quick question how do you think colleges work? like do you think the money can teach me how to build a bridge
Concerned Alum • Jan 29, 2025 at 12:20 am
No it does not. That is an astoundingly arrogant statement. And if they were “some of the best in the game” then the College would surely be rated quite a bit higher. Without the donations of the hard working alums and tuition of the hard working parents, some of the “best in the game” wouldn’t be playing their game at all.
But this is the same ole saw, namely, the notion that the faculty are irreplaceable. News flash. Nobody is. The world is full of PhD’s who can’t, so they teach.
You know what it isn’t full of? College age students. That population is on the decline. Small wonder any prospective student would look at this chaos and want to attend Lafayette.
current student • Jan 29, 2025 at 2:26 pm
the thing is that staff and faculty who leave or are fired aren’t being replaced. approx. 50% of people who have been fired in the past 4 years haven’t been replaced. while i know it’s important to fundraise, there would be no lafayette without professors. plus, this was a last resort measure. they’ve already tried to find other ways to fix issues with hurd, and are only doing this because she very explicitly doesn’t listen to them or their feedback.
Charles Berman '24 • Jan 28, 2025 at 8:31 pm
What an absolute embarrassment. These results are incredibly disappointing as it really does demonstrate how out of touch the faculty are with the opinion of the general student body. Hurd has always been an advocate for every Lafayette student. The student looking to receive a tremendous education while attending a school with a rich tradition and a vibrant community. Her idea of “AND” was welcomed by everyone when she arrived because it triumped students who take advantage of the immense amount of opportunities that Lafayette has to offer instead of complaining about little thing that goes wrong. The students who are both dedicated scholars while also being athletes, tour guides, and members of Greek life organizations or clubs. I hope that instead of overreacting to this display of petulant complaining masquerading as activism and care for the students, the board takes their time to decide on the fate of President Hurd. I hope the student council holds a similar referendum in which the student’s voice can be heard.
Anti-Hurd '25 • Jan 28, 2025 at 9:10 pm
This is absolutely not true. All Hurd has done for students is offer meaningless apologies and very little true work to foster community among students. She does very little to address real issues on campus, and talks over or silences those who truly want to make this campus a better place. She’s a very milquetoast leader more concerned with appearances than the things that an academic institution should be concerned with (academics).
President Hurd must go • Jan 29, 2025 at 5:39 pm
It’s Student Government, not Student Council. They will likely do another rubber stamp proceeding like they did with the strategic plan. It doesn’t take much to convince a few students to vote a particular way, in this case all it took was a dinner apparently. This particular Student Government administration, elected with the votes of only a quarter of the Student Body, way down from the 50-60% Student Government election turnout Lafayette was known for in the 2010s, any shambolic vote to counter the faculty’s voice would be meaningless.
It was apparent from the staged protests that most students are either ambivalent or not particularly supportive of President Hurd.
Hope Forchange • Jan 28, 2025 at 7:32 pm
Those of you commenting are not administrators nor faculty. The hardships the Hurd administration has caused should not be ignored.
Every VP has left or been forced out, tenure faculty have left, staff are retiring early. This did not happen when Alison took over for Dan.
There is a distrust with the leadership team and it is rightfully earned. I fully expect the board to do nothing, but may this symbolic be the start of change.
John • Jan 28, 2025 at 7:03 pm
No one was as bad as Alison Byerly (Ally B) she was an insensitive jerk
William B. Farinon ‘39 • Jan 28, 2025 at 7:50 pm
She’s a victim of a broken American private college system that prioritizes above all else increasing the endowment. She correctly recognized that alumni athletes who primarily studied economics are the most willing and able to donate, even if this money would be going to constructing a lacrosse center for two of the worst division 1 lacrosse programs in the country between the men’s and women’s teams.
The faculty are living in a fantasy world where a school like Lafayette is going to be academically competitive with truly elite American colleges.
This entire circus is nothing more than an embarrassment for the entire Lafayette community. Meanwhile tuition is up, acceptance rate is up, and the food on campus still sucks.
Randy Uhler • Jan 28, 2025 at 9:13 pm
Allison Byerly is a born leader and the best President at Lafayette in my lifetime! Big mistake not to keep her on a while more! Hindsight is always 20-20. Nicole had a tough act to follow which is not really her fault. There’s more to this story I’m sure.
Brown • Jan 28, 2025 at 6:44 pm
Trustees should consider standing with LC students and allow President Hurd continue to run the institution. Faculty who voted for no confidence here have done possibly worse damage to the college than any idea proposed in Master Plan or Strategic Plan. The unspoken reality is faculty face little repercussion for ongoing agitation. They have luxury lifestyles in the world of higher education and refuse to admit they work for a financial firm (the endowment) and not a social justice enterprise. What a mess.
Anti-Hurd '25 • Jan 28, 2025 at 8:02 pm
Coming from a student — President Hurd has never done anything to adequately address student issues either. She is very wishy-washy and “listens” to what issues we have without actually doing anything. The two YikYak hate campaigns against Posse and then against Out/Lavender Lane resulted in unproductive conversations and no actual changes to the way that the school deals with minorities on campus. All Hurd does is apologize after something bad happens, and then move on without doing anything to help the people involved. All she cares about is looking good and bolstering her own reputation without actually doing the work that is required to foster a welcoming and actually academic environment.
Laf Student. • Jan 29, 2025 at 1:33 am
Like trustees don’t live luxury lifestyles? Get a fucking grip.
Concerned Alum • Jan 29, 2025 at 8:57 am
That they earned. You should put your head down, work hard and try it.
current student • Jan 29, 2025 at 2:28 pm
i’ll bet that 90% of the trustees are white men with generational wealth. they did 0 of the work for their money and get all the credit.
Save Pres Hurd • Jan 28, 2025 at 6:38 pm
MY SHAYLAAAAAAAAA